×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

American Indian and Indigenous Peoples Historic Context Study - Public Review Draft

Review and comment on the draft document

Click directly on the document to submit a comment. Please keep your comments focused on the content of the plan and refrain from using offensive, profane or explicit language.

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…

Summary

All Hide

Introduction

Overview of the study and the Denver in Context Series, as well as definitions, background and methodology. 

Chapter 1

Denver: Ancestral Unceded Territory

Chapter 2

Urban Native Communities and Connections to Tribal Homelands

Chapter 3

Denver as the Center of Indian Country: Past and Present

Chapter 4

Honoring the Survivors and Victims of the Sand Creek Massacre 

Chapter 5

Federal and Colorado Indian Policy and Intergenerational Trauma

Chapter 6

Ongoing Fight for Rights and Respect

Chapter 7

Indigenous Language Revitalization and Cultural Preservation

Chapter 8

Indigenous Resilience and Cultural Resurgence 

Community Recommendations

Summary of recommendations from the American Indian community   

Powered by Konveio

Comments

View all Cancel

Add comment


Suggestion
Listing the names of the murdered Elders immediately after the harrowing account of the mother and child tends to lessen the impact of the first account. I would move the list of Elders to a point AFTER the paragraphs about children.
Question
ON the Plains?
Question
Traditionally, we’d see the word PIONEER, used here, but there does seem to be a difference in connotation between that, and COLONIST.
Suggestion
… which IS still …
Question
Should this be “by” White settlers?
Question
Does this estimate require any nuance? According to Rick Williams via email to me, There may be around 100k enrolled in Federally recognized Nations, or inflated to up to 200k based on expanding terminology (indigenous vs. american indian/native american + first peoples).
Suggestion
An intro to this section could highlight our opportunity to return to the first hill or White section of the wheel, but doing so in a way that disrupts the historical patterns of colonialism. The intro could also challenge us to make-good on the 5th stage of the "Spectrum of community partnership" resource I shared at the top of this document. The 5th stage is a deferring to community ownership where "we are building community ownership to ensure communities have a direct say over what is needed to survive and thrive" (p. 7).
in reply to Aaron Conley's comment
Suggestion
Ha. Sorry. I just missed the subhead several pages below. Please dismiss this original comment
Suggestion
This chapter does not have a "4th hill" labeled section.
Question
Is it appropriate to mention tensions and emerging constraints of technologies as well? For instance, archiving this project has raised numerous cautions about continued extraction, information ownership, etc.
Suggestion
"supporters" were comprised primarily of their parents and relatives who had peacefully gathered to demand answers from West HS administrators. Tear gas was thrown from helicopters over the gathered crowd.
Question
Do we need a note about the problematic tensions imposed by needing Native people to work in and for the very colonial systems that are roots of the problems?
Lovely framework in sense that history builds upon itself in the same way that geography is layered.
Suggestion
1851 - Horse Creek Treaty
1868 - Fort Laramie Treaty
Question
It is my understanding that the term “ Native American” was developed in 1971 by the United States Census Bureau, and NOT as the result of social activism.
Suggestion
awkward phrase ("This chapter describes") since we are already well underway in the chapter.
Question
is it worth noting that boarding schools was a colonial tactic inflicted on other indigenous peoples in other parts of the globe?
Question
If Brown was Native, do we want a parenthetical reference to his tribe both here and earlier in this chapter where his name first appears?
Suggestion
"Dorris (Dee) Brown"
Suggestion
how about returning to a mention of the 4th hill in this paragraph to remind the reader of the uniting significance of these organizations?
Question
sometimes "white" is capitalized and sometimes it isn't in this same paragraph.
Question
do we need a note in the intro section to explain person-naming conventions used in this document?
Question
was 'imaginary boundaries' an earlier practice of late feudalism and common within euro-colonialism, and thus predates the specific time frame of "manifest destiny' or westward expansion?
Question
sense? spelling?
Question
up to now, the other block quotes were introduced or concluded with the speaker's name and Nation, for context. This one doesn't seem to have that
Suggestion
Not sure if this framework helps, but we've more or less followed the developmental stages of "The Spectrum of Community Engagement to Ownership" model. Each subsection here advances City/Tribal ties by moving away from "ignoring/marginalization, informing/placation, and consulting/tokenizing." Under the direction of the advisory committee, leaders and elders, we've engaged the process through "involvement/voice and power shifting, collaboration/delegated power sharing, and finally to Deferring to/community ownership." (link)
Suggestion
"through intentional and equitable processes."
Buffalo Bill did not "host" shows in Denver in 1914 or 1915. As the pdf says "He traveled with. . ." link Cody's show was seized by the sheriff in 1913 and he was essentially forced to perform with the Sells Floto Circus owned by Harry Tammen, who also owned the Denver Post.
The Buffalo Bill Museum and Grave is not on the National Register of Historic Places. Lookout Mountain Park is on the NR. The stone picnic shelter, restroom, and two fireplaces are contributing resources as is the Pahaska Tepee, which originally housed the museum. The current museum and William "Buffalo Bill" Cody's grave are listed as noncontributing. See link
in reply to Aaron Conley's comment
Or rather, the organization of pagination in this online doc is rather confusing given the "page" breaks
Suggestion
Table of contents begins on p 3