×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Far Southwest Area Plan - Second Public Review Draft

Thank you to everyone that read and provided comments on the second draft of the Far Southwest Area Plan. You can still read and download the document, however commenting on this platform is now closed. If you would like to share thoughts or opinions with the project team, please use the comment form.

Visit the project page for additional information about the plan or other ways to get involved.

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio

Comments

View all Cancel

Commenting is closed for this document.


Wow, no! Big box right next to senior living? Nope.
Yes, this is true. It is also the reason many of us moved here, and we understand and accept the need to drive.
Do not want this area to be upzoned to commercial. Any changes to this area should be subject to community consultation before changing.
Disagree. This is affordable housing and should NOT be turned into retail or commercial. This would contradict the affordable housing efforts.
Yes to community feedback!
Bike network in Ft. Logan south of Quincy needs to connect more easily to the Bear Creek trail through F. Logan
Ft. Logan South is primarily well established single family homes of various sizes. People live here for the suburban nature of the neighborhood and this should be preserved.
Along Lowell Blvd in Ft Logan South are some income restricted housing, townhouses and duplexes. These should be retained as an area of housing affordability.
I hope we don’t get a lot more drive thrus, but where else would you put them except along the corridors of Sheridan and Wadsworth? Certainly not in the neighborhoods!
Agree that the focused growth areas should be along the existing corridors.
Question
Is there potential for, or will this include, bringing the gulch back above ground so it's more like Sanderson Gulch or Bear Creek?
Suggestion
The existing Federal Blvd pedestrian crossing in front of All Saints Cathedral is a very important connection. It could be improved (or this new proposed crossing can replace it) to be more like the Federal crossing of the Sanderson Gulch Trail with better striping and push buttons much farther away from the road.
There will be a new farmer's market on the park at Kunsmiller Creative Arts Academy starting in 2026.
Suggestion
I live in Harvey Park and I like the character of the ranch style homes. There was even a new ranch that was built in the last 5 year that fits in with the original houses. It's still a reasonably sized home because it has a basement and a detached garage.
However, we saw a new modern style mini mansion go in on Yale this year that looks so out of place. I support new home building but I would like to put in place requirements that encourage new homes to fit in, unlike what we've seen in other Denver neighborhoods (specifically, giant 2-3 story single family homes or duplexes that shroud the original ranches or cottages).
Suggestion
There are two private HOA-only lakes in west Harvey Park. At least one of them has a playground and tennis courts. I would like to see an effort to open this up to all the homes in the area because it would be wasteful to create new public amenities in this area when they already exist.
Strongly agree with F-L3. Federal Blvd is not attractive to visit as a pedestrian. But the reality is that it's mostly local businesses. I think we could improve the built environment to make it a friendly place for pedestrians and actually improve the business outcomes and attract new businesses too.
I live in Harvey Park and I support denser housing in the Far Southwest. I don't think residents realize that one of the reasons we don't have as many amenities as other neighborhoods is because of the low density. Not everyone needs to own a single family home.
I live in Harvey Park and I'm grateful for the thought and intentions that went into this!
Suggestion
Please no more car-focused anything. This only encourages people to drive and will make traffic and congestion worse and prevent improvement for people trying to reverse that by biking, walking and taking transit.
Suggestion
I don't think there should be a maximum building height.
Love these recommendations!
I live in Harvey Park and we are so isolated from services due to the large neighborhoods with no business zoning. It is typically over a mile for most people to walk to something that isn't just houses. This area is missing the charm of places like S Pearl St.
Business quality is mixed both on Federal and Sheridan with some doctors, services and restaurants/carts but a lot of uninviting chains like Autozone.
Suggestion
Would love to see mention or acknowledgement of any buildings or sites with cultural or historic significance to broader ethnic and socioeconomic civilian groups in area. This is an opportunity for the city to identify potential sites for recognition or protection that have been overlooked. An example is a block of houses near the Evans Station that is a unique masonry townhouse style dating back near the 1920s.
Suggestion
City sould prioritize Industrial site development that integrate relevant strategies from the Living Building or Living Community Challenge(s), or LEED (e.g. Neighborhood Development, Operations & Maintenance, or Interior Design & Construction). Integrating these strategies would not only improve building/site performance in relation to L6 goals, particularly supporting a range of education and skill levels; it would also be an innovative venture for the region.
Suggestion
5 stories is too high, even for mixed-use buildings where the ground floor may be commercial with residential above it. The value added by increasing density would be at the expense of quality of life for building residents as well as passersby. There should be a correlation between building square footage and free, publicly accessible lobby/rooftop/plaza space. 3 stories is in keeping with the culture of the area and should be maintained as the maximum.
Question
Why 5 stories? That seems high. I wish the max height was 3 stories. 5 stories blocks view and creates too much traffic on the road.