×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Southwest Area Plan Public Review Draft Survey

Review the highlights of the draft plan and tell us what you think

This is a summary of the key ideas in the draft Southwest Area Plan.  Please review and provde feedback by clicking the icons on the left to answer questions.  There are new questions on every page, even if the icon doesn't change.

You may also review the full draft of the plan or visit the project page for additional ways to get involved.

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment


in reply to Anon's comment
So many great highlights here. There is such an opportunity to bring life over here with the new stadium.
in reply to Gabriel's comment
Suggestion
A protected bike lane and better sidewalks along Mississippi all the way to Broadway would be such an improvement.
Suggestion
Mississippi has so much potential for business, streetscaping, and mobility. I'd really like to see this street cleaned up with better sidewalks/bike lanes and new restaurants/bars.
in reply to Allyson's comment
Suggestion
Agreed. It's strange to me how many disconnected trails we have. I'd really like to see the off-street trail network expand.
Suggestion
Please continue to develop bicycle mobility, it's a win for everyone. Protected bike lanes are ideal.
in reply to John's comment
100% agree with Alejandro here. Increased bicycle mobility is best for everyone.
in reply to John's comment
Suggestion
Each person on a bike is one less person driving a car and adding to traffic.
in reply to Zachary Collier's comment
Suggestion
agreed this needs to happen sooner than the 20 year vision this plan is setting, but this plan should consider what is causing the Alameda's surface to fall into disrepair so quickly? that should be in the plan to improve drainage and other infrastructure so that the road can be more easily maintained.
Improve ped / bike along Mississippi
Suggestion
update graphic for new stadium.
Suggestion
Incentives for industry that supports waterway restoration. Development or operational incentives for sustainable business that are contributing to healthy community adjacent to the river.
Suggestion
Honoring the history, from the rivers indigenous uses to education on the harmful history of mining/milling and dumping. This is a priority now to repair the waterway because its historically since colonization/ westward expansion/ industrialization, became a dumping ground for waste.
in reply to Allyson's comment
Suggestion
agreed when I think of improved safety for peds and bikes along the river, I think that river trail is safe, its accessing the river trail that is uncomfortable and difficult.
Suggestion
defined path for walkers and cyclists could be nice adjacent to Ruby Hill and Overland. there are lots of leisure walkers in the area and lots of high speed cyclists. Can we have dedicate space for each in lieu of shared path?
Suggestion
for bikes/peds a north/south path along Evans that is west of Broadway and east of the elevated bridge could improve ped safety and slow traffic on Evans
Suggestion
Improvements for Bikes and Peds over Evans over the river are needed
Suggestion
Jewell Pedestrian bridge will get people over rail and santa fe, but still need access over the river at jewell/south edge of golf course.
Suggestion
suggest prioritizing connectivity for pedestrians from surrounding communities to new NWSL stadium location. Just off this plan is the North Bridge at the Broadway Station. There is also access from the rail station to the west communities in Ahmar and Mar Lee.
Suggestion
I think this could be more generic. The streets parallel to Federal aren't the only ones with high speed vehicles adjacent to pedestrians.
Question
This is a confusing page. The map below is not where buildings are 3 stories or less. Is this map proposing where buildings will be limited in height?
Suggestion
suggest adding height on north side of Evans as well as west of Santa Fe and Rail.
Suggestion
its unclear why this section of Broadway which already has a precedent of denser blocks and 5 story buildings is limited here to 3, where further south, where there are fewer taller buildings the height increase. This should all be 5. or all be 3. I would encourage the preservation of the pedestrian 1 and 2 story buildings on the major pedestrian retail along Broadway and push the density of height increase to the east and west of Broadway.
Suggestion
In order to preserve the peace and enjoyment residents get out of the Sanderson Gulch Trail, I would suggest new housing not be built near/along the trail.
Suggestion
This area is already congested with people and traffic. Adding housing only adds to the tight space we are living in now and based on what is currently on Federal, just another plain ole ugly buildings. Maybe they would not be so ugly if they were not surrounded by unkept businesses. There are no convenient services in this area and because of the constant heavy traffic, residents will need a car and parking, and walking for basic necessities will be dangerous. Let’s face it, this area is ugly and dirty and needs a business clean up before providing housing to people who can only walk to fast food stores, marijuana dispensaries and the men’s only club.
Mar Lee resident
Suggestion
I have found through direct participation in curated arts programs that it is one of the most popular and effective ways to develop cohesive environments. Thoughtful consideration to public walls and spaces enhances the spirit of the community. Programming and celebrations for artisans in and of the community will breathe life and excitement into the evolution of these neighborhoods.
My biggest concern with Lipan is that we're going to build stuff with no infrastructure supporting it. It's a small street with lots of traffic already, so make sure the road is expanded and parking, pedestrian, and bike use is prioritized
Need to have numerous east/west crossings, especially given the new stadium coming in
Streetscape and tree canopy is a HUGE need all throughout the SW area plan, especially along alameda and federal
Parking, pedestrian, and bike traffic need to be prioritized, regardless of what's built. Lipan is a very small street and would need to be expanded to support anything
in reply to Allyson's comment
Suggestion
There's a bridge across the river at Vanderbilt?! I had no clue, please open that!
Suggestion
Any housing, especially apartment housing, needs to have parking for all residents. Like a spot for each unit minimum, otherwise people will have a hard time living in the area.
in reply to Anon's comment
Suggestion
I definitely agree with the height restriction, once buildings get too massive, it takes away from feeling like a neighborhood. Also, ADUs and single/multi-family dwellings should be prioritized versus apartment complexes
Question
Housing density is not an option because especially if there’s no parking and if gas, water, electricity resources usage is taken into consideration. I.e. It appears the planners build apartments without parking thinking I guess that tenants ride their bicycle in the snow to work.
Suggestion
Please use city grant and tax funds to create MANY new pocket (AND LARGER, WHEN POSIBLE) parks throughout the southwest area -- MarLee has no parks and is almost completely residential.....please use grant funds and tax monies to purchase lots and homes to be cleared for such parks. ALSO............this area needs many hundreds of additional trees to be planted. AND can you acquire foundation and other sources to provide grants to homeowners to enhance the yards / outsides of their homes with welcoming landscaping that can be used by residents? Thank you!
in reply to Anon's comment
Agreed - well said
Suggestion
This is a good idea but having lived here long enough, this will end up being the only item on the list that gets accomplished - and I don't think it is high priority enough. Since people from more affluent neighborhoods will also use this, it will be one of the few things SW Denver receives.
Suggestion
Now that there is parking from the apartments along Lipan near Exposition, making Lipan even busier is just a horrible idea.
Suggestion
I have lived in Athmar Park for 20 years and one constant is that the leaders of the city will ignore this area of Denver. The last 5 years have been horrible as they have overbuilt without providing any type of infrastructure to support it. Getting to work in the morning has become a chore if you don't leave before 7. This plan will bring more of this, that is one thing you can believe in.
Suggestion
So we have a bunch of planned housing with no more planned roads? The developers get the profits from building the housing and the community gets the taxes to create the infrastructure supporting the new development? How about you guys have your developer friends build the infrastructure to support their highly profitable infrastructure? It is nearly impossible to get out of this neighborhood in the morning the way it is without you building cramming even more people into this area!
Suggestion
If you want affordable housing, quit passing 'fees' (taxes for politicians without a backbone to ask voters for the tax increase). the way the city is going, it will consist of the rich people who can afford to live here and the poor people being subsidized. The middle class can find somewhere else that cares. In short, if you want people to be able to afford to live here, quit stealing our money!
in reply to Anon's comment
I agree with height restriction and making efforts to ensure any new development is equitable and with the culture and community in mind.
in reply to Anon's comment
Suggestion
Yes! 100%
Suggestion
Give the land along Mississippi Ave as much flexibility as possible for residential and mixed use and other.
Suggestion
I am all for pedestrian and bicycle connections, but please don't make vehicle traffic worst then it already is.
Suggestion
Having the Sanderson Gulch Trail run under Federal here would be amazing for connecting Southwest Denver with itself, especially considering how many cars I see run the red light for the At-Grade ped crossing here.
Suggestion
Since the whole area is already pretty low density/single story strip malls along Federal, I would like to see a height cap of 3 stories first before bumping things up to five in order to help manage the rate of change of the neighborhoods.
Suggestion
The city has been talking about "affordable" housing for a decade plus now and continues to fail on the promise of this phrase while relying on private real estate developers. Following the established guidelines for "affordable", the majority of residents who qualify for those units till find themselves rent-burdened & unable to increase their take home pay without risking displacement.

Any plan talking about the future of housing in this city needs to consider & advocate for social housing of the sort like Vienna, Austria has.
in reply to Anon's comment
Whole heartedly agree
I don’t understand this diagram